Ministry of Justice

Review of the Presumption of Parental Involvement

Baroness Scott of Bybrook: My honourable friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice (Alex Chalk) has made the following Written Statement."On the 25th June 2020, the Government published the Final Report on Assessing Risk of Harm to Children and Parents in Private Law Children Cases, alongside an Implementation Plan. The Report contained a number of recommendations from a Panel that included external experts, and the Implementation Plan set out how the Government proposed to address the recommendations.One of the recommendations made by the Panel was “that the presumption of parental involvement be reviewed urgently in order to address its detrimental effects.”I am pleased to announce the commencement of a review into the presumption of parental involvement in child arrangements, and certain other private law children, proceedings. This review will focus on the application of the presumption and the statutory exception in cases where there are allegations or other evidence to suggest that involvement of the parent would put the child at risk of harm.The Review will focus both on the courts’ application of the presumption, as well as on the impact on children’s welfare of the courts’ application of these provisions. In particular, the Review will examine:(i) how courts are applying sections 1(2A), (2B) and (6) of the Children Act 1989, which together require courts to presume, in child arrangements and certain other private law children proceedings, that involvement of a parent in the child’s life will further the child’s welfare, unless there is evidence to suggest that involvement of that parent would put the child at risk of suffering harm, and to define involvement as ‘involvement of some kind, either direct or indirect, but not any particular division of a child’s time’; (ii) and the impacts on children’s welfare of the courts’ application of these provisionsThis is an important, and complex, issue and this approach is intended to identify whether any reforms are needed in this area, and if so, what kind (legislative or otherwise), and to ensure that any conclusions and recommendations are rooted in a solid understanding of the effect of the presumption and its exception, and the evidence base surrounding its application.I am establishing an Advisory Group to guide the evidence gathering for this important Review. The Advisory Group members will be:Rachel Thomas, Welsh Children’s Commissioner’s OfficeNicole Jacobs, the Domestic Abuse CommissionerPeter Jackson LJHHJ Michelle CorbettJacky Tiotto, CEO CafcassMatthew Pinnell, Cafcass CymruTammy Knox, ResolutionMichael Lewkowicz, Families Need Fathers The evidence that this Review will gather will include a case file review, input from those working in the family courts and an academic literature review of how the presumption is currently applied and the impact of parental involvement on the wellbeing of the child.The Ministry of Justice will follow a competitive tender process to identify the most appropriate individuals to conduct the evidence review.I anticipate being able to update the House before summer recess with the outcomes of the Review."

Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office

Report into violations in Belarus

Baroness Sugg: My rt hon Friend the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs (Dominic Raab) has today made the following Written Ministerial Statement:The Government has welcomed the publication of the report by the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe’s (OSCE) independent rapporteur, Professor Wolfgang Benedek on Belarus. The report was initiated under the Moscow Mechanism to consider Alleged Human Rights Violations related to the Presidential Elections in Belarus on 9 August 2020.As I noted in my statement to the House of 24 September, alongside 16 other Participating States at the OSCE on 17 September, the United Kingdom invoked the Moscow Mechanism of the human dimension of the OSCE. This triggered an independent investigation into credible reports of electoral fraud and human rights violation before, during and after the Presidential elections in Belarus. The investigation commenced on 30 September and is now complete. The report was formally presented to the OSCE Permanent Council on 5 November 2020 and was welcomed by all 17 invoking States in a Joint Statement. The UK also made a national statement to welcome its publication.Belarus refused to cooperate with the rapporteur or allow him access to the country. Nevertheless, the report draws heavily on evidence and observations from international organisations and mechanisms, as well as more than 700 submissions from Belarusian citizens and organisations.The findings of the report are clear.The report concludes that the allegations that the elections were not transparent, as well as neither free nor fair, are accurate and well evidenced. The report notes that from the selection of the national electoral commission through to vote counting, Belarus fell short of its international commitments and of the basic requirements of previous OSCE and Council of Europe election monitoring reports.The report finds that the allegations of human rights violations have been proven beyond doubt and that the Belarusian authorities have carried out violations on a massive and systematic scale. The report highlights the environment of impunity that exists in Belarus; no one has been held accountable for the well documented cases of torture and inhumane treatment by the security forces. The report also confirms that freedom of the media and the safety of journalists are under sustained attack in Belarus.The report makes 82 recommendations to the Belarusian authorities including new Presidential elections, an immediate end to the violence and release of all those illegally detained, an independent oversight mechanism on detention conditions, and an investigation into all allegations of torture.The Government calls on Belarus to implement all of the recommendations included in the Report. Further, the report makes 16 recommendations to OSCE Participants and the wider international community. The UK has already begun to implement the majority of these recommendations. In addition, the UK supports the recommendation that Belarus must hold new elections and that a detailed and thorough investigation in the human rights violations is required.A copy of the Report is being placed in the Library of both Houses.

Department for International Trade

Negotiations on the UK’s Future Trading Relationship with New Zealand: Update

Lord Grimstone of Boscobel: My Rt Hon Friend the Secretary of State for International Trade (Liz Truss MP) has today made the following statement.The second UK-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement (FTA) negotiating round took place from 19th October to 2nd November. Negotiators carried out 46 sessions over two weeks, covering all areas of the proposed FTA, and bringing us closer to agreeing an ambitious FTA. Between round one and round two both sides shared 35 draft texts and 25 position papers, which enabled detailed and constructive talks.The talks underscored both countries’ commitment to removing trade barriers and creating new opportunities for business, and a belief that a deep and dynamic agreement can send a clear signal to the world that both the UK and New Zealand are prepared to fight protectionism and advance free and fair trade.There has been encouraging progress on numerous areas of common interest. In the area of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises, both sides reaffirmed their ambition to agree a chapter that will enable these businesses to fully benefit from the FTA. Productive conversations were also held on trade and the environment and promoting clean growth, where both countries are working closely together to support sustainable outcomes across the agreement.Discussions also demonstrated shared ambition in trade in services, particularly exploring opportunities for the recognition of professional qualifications, as well as exploring innovative provisions to promote sustainable finance and diversity in the financial services sector. Our negotiations on digital trade also underlined shared aspirations, and a mutual intent to agree a cutting-edge chapter.The groundwork was laid for the exchange of initial goods market access offers as well as positive discussions in the areas of Rules of Origin and Customs on agreeing simple, modern customs procedures that consider current and future supply chains.The UK and New Zealand are both keen to continue the momentum of discussions, and the third negotiating round is expected to take place in January 2021.Below is a summary list of those areas discussed in the round, which continued to take place by video conference:Anti-CorruptionCompetitionConsumer ProtectionCustomsDigital tradeState-to-State Dispute SettlementEnvironment and Clean GrowthFinancial ServicesGood Regulatory PracticeTrade in GoodsIndigenous TradeIntellectual PropertyInvestmentLabourLegal & InstitutionalProcurementRemediesRules of OriginSanitary and Phytosanitary MeasuresServices (including Cross Border Trade in Services, Professional Business Services, Transport and Delivery Services, and Movement of Natural Persons)Small and Medium-sized EnterprisesState Owned EnterprisesTechnical Barriers to TradeTelecomsTrade and Women’s Economic EmpowermentTrade for DevelopmentAny deal the UK Government agrees will be fair and balanced and in the best interests of the whole of the UK. We remain committed to upholding our high environmental, labour, food safety and animal welfare standards in our trade agreement with New Zealand, as well as protecting the National Health Service (NHS).